<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Fee: Hope Rising</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/</link>
	<description>Just another WordPress weblog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 14:34:10 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cornelius</title>
		<link>http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/comment-page-1/#comment-61</link>
		<dc:creator>Cornelius</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejointreview.com/?p=249#comment-61</guid>
		<description>I added your blog to bookmarks. And i&#039;ll read your articles more often!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I added your blog to bookmarks. And i&#8217;ll read your articles more often!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conner</title>
		<link>http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/comment-page-1/#comment-50</link>
		<dc:creator>Conner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 16:22:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejointreview.com/?p=249#comment-50</guid>
		<description>Hmm...I too am interested Mark in your opinion. I dug Burn For You or We Shine depending on which version you got. I get what you&#039;re saying about it though. I might say &quot;they tried too hard&quot; on the last one. Which was a valiant effort but might have come off a bit &quot;plasticy.&quot; 
I don&#039;t think that happened here. More stable legs and song writing as Mike said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm&#8230;I too am interested Mark in your opinion. I dug Burn For You or We Shine depending on which version you got. I get what you&#8217;re saying about it though. I might say &#8220;they tried too hard&#8221; on the last one. Which was a valiant effort but might have come off a bit &#8220;plasticy.&#8221;<br />
I don&#8217;t think that happened here. More stable legs and song writing as Mike said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Mahoney</title>
		<link>http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/comment-page-1/#comment-49</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Mahoney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 17:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejointreview.com/?p=249#comment-49</guid>
		<description>Mark, I think you&#039;ll find this one a little more fun than We Shine.  At least I did.  Perhaps it&#039;s that they are a little more seasoned, or that these songs are a little better.

Looking forward to your opinion of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mark, I think you&#8217;ll find this one a little more fun than We Shine.  At least I did.  Perhaps it&#8217;s that they are a little more seasoned, or that these songs are a little better.</p>
<p>Looking forward to your opinion of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alastair</title>
		<link>http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/comment-page-1/#comment-48</link>
		<dc:creator>Alastair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 16:50:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejointreview.com/?p=249#comment-48</guid>
		<description>Hey Mark, let us know what you think about it when you have listened to it...!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Mark, let us know what you think about it when you have listened to it&#8230;!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Thomas</title>
		<link>http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/comment-page-1/#comment-47</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Thomas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejointreview.com/?p=249#comment-47</guid>
		<description>Thanks for this review fellas! I&#039;m definitely gonna check this one out. I hated their last album, it was just way too &quot;plastic&quot; for me. But this sounds like it will be great. Been waiting for it for a long time!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for this review fellas! I&#8217;m definitely gonna check this one out. I hated their last album, it was just way too &#8220;plastic&#8221; for me. But this sounds like it will be great. Been waiting for it for a long time!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MandoRon</title>
		<link>http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/comment-page-1/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>MandoRon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2009 11:23:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejointreview.com/?p=249#comment-38</guid>
		<description>Can&#039;t wait!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t wait!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Joint Goes Official! &#171; Worship City</title>
		<link>http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/comment-page-1/#comment-36</link>
		<dc:creator>The Joint Goes Official! &#171; Worship City</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 04:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejointreview.com/?p=249#comment-36</guid>
		<description>[...] now 4 of us are cranking out the music reviews. Up most recently has been the review of Fee&#8217;s Hope Rising. Before that we had Brenton Brown, Todd Agnew, David Crowder*Band just to name a few. It&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] now 4 of us are cranking out the music reviews. Up most recently has been the review of Fee&#8217;s Hope Rising. Before that we had Brenton Brown, Todd Agnew, David Crowder*Band just to name a few. It&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russ Hutto</title>
		<link>http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/comment-page-1/#comment-32</link>
		<dc:creator>Russ Hutto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 21:43:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejointreview.com/?p=249#comment-32</guid>
		<description>Great review, guys!

Keep em coming.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great review, guys!</p>
<p>Keep em coming.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Joint Review: Fee &#8211; Hope Rising!! &#171; Live to Worship</title>
		<link>http://thejointreview.com/2009/10/02/fee-hope-rising/comment-page-1/#comment-31</link>
		<dc:creator>The Joint Review: Fee &#8211; Hope Rising!! &#171; Live to Worship</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 17:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thejointreview.com/?p=249#comment-31</guid>
		<description>[...] to tell you how good this album is for a while now.  Hope Rising is only the 2nd album ever on The Joint to get a perfect score.  The Fee boys have produced something very great [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to tell you how good this album is for a while now.  Hope Rising is only the 2nd album ever on The Joint to get a perfect score.  The Fee boys have produced something very great [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
